On 09/18/2018 02:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: > > tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c > > between commit: > > 50c6b58a814d ("tls: fix currently broken MSG_PEEK behavior") > > from the net tree and commit: > > c2ad647c6442 ("selftests/tls: Add test for recv(PEEK) spanning across multiple records") > > from the net-next tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. The test from 50c6b58a814d supersedes the one from c2ad647c6442 so the recv_peek_large_buf_mult_recs could be removed; latter was also not working correctly due to this bug. Thanks, Daniel