RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 12:57 PM
> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Stephen Rothwell
> <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason
> Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-
> next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
> 
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:48:21AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >>  	inline_page_count = num_pages(port->inline_data_size);
> > >>  	inline_sge_count = max(cm_id->device->attrs.max_sge_rd,
> > >> -				cm_id->device->attrs.max_sge) - 1;
> > >> +				cm_id->device->attrs.max_send_sge) -
1;
> > >
> > > This should be max_recv_sge.
> >
> > Why do we even have this conflicts to begin with?
> 
> Because the nvme code added a new user of max_sges while the RDMA tree
> split it into two separate fields.  We discussed this a while ago when
> the issue came up.

See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg66208.html 

Steve.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux