Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the amlogic tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Commits
>>
>>   3f1ad8c53b29 ("ARM64: dts: meson: enable the saradc node in meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi")
>>   4dabd157d48e ("ARM64: dts: meson-gx-p23x-q20x: move the wifi node to each board's .dts")
>>
>> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>
> Oops.  I missed these.
>
> Olof, these were just merged by you in my PR[1].  How do you want me to
> handle this?
>
> I could respin the PR, or just send another with them reverted then
> re-applied with signoff?
>
> Or, since these branches don't need to be static (yet), I suppose you
> could just edit the commits and add my signoff.
>
> I'm OK with any of the above, let me know your preferene.

Hi,

Fresh pull requests is probably easiest for all. I'll drop the one I brought in.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux