On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:24:26AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > I see, we have no more lockless API for IDA anymore :-(. In our case, > we were already protected by the the nfnl_lock mutex, which it was > sufficient to ensure non-concurrent access to IDA structures. You're actually the first user for whom this is true. For every other user, the requirement to manage their own spinlock was a pain. > Unless I'm missing anything, the new API forces use to the spinlock > call with disabled irq for each time we update something from the > netfilter netlink interface, so that's a no-go for us. I can't believe that's a serious problem for you, though. You're calling sscanf(), this can't possibly be a performance path. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
