On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:07:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 940efcc8889f ("RDMA/uverbs: Protect from attempts to create flows on unsupported QP")
>
> from the rdma-fixes tree and commit:
>
> e99028ad76e7 ("RDMA/uverbs: Check existence of create_flow callback")
>
> from the rdma tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> index 87ffeebc0b28,5fc14fde274c..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> @@@ -3559,11 -3554,11 +3554,16 @@@ int ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow(struct ib_
> goto err_uobj;
> }
>
> + if (qp->qp_type != IB_QPT_UD && qp->qp_type != IB_QPT_RAW_PACKET) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_put;
> + }
> +
> + if (!qp->device->create_flow) {
> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto err_put;
> + }
> +
Thanks Stephen, looks good.
> flow_attr = kzalloc(struct_size(flow_attr, flows,
> cmd.flow_attr.num_of_specs), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!flow_attr) {
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
