Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   d3d6923cd1ae ("x86/mce: Carve out the crashing_cpu check")
> 
> from the tip tree and commit:
> 
>   f6785eac562b ("x86/memory_failure: Introduce {set,clear}_mce_nospec()")
> 
> from the nvdimm tree.

Dan, we have rules how to deal with that stuff and there is no excuse for
you to collect random patches and apply them as you see fit. Stop this
please.

MCE/RAS patches have a well established and working route and if something
in your tree really depends on this, which I'm not seeing at all, then
there are well documented and established procedures to do that.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux