Re: linux-next: manual merge of the y2038 tree with the overlayfs tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is now a conflict between the overlayfs tree and Linus' tree.  (I
> restarted my merging after I noticed that Linus merged more stuff.)

Right, I had mentioned this in my pull request message to Linus. Until
yesterday, I had the conflict resolution against the overlayfs and NFS
trees in my y2038 tree and was waiting for both to get merged first
so I could send the pull request. NFS got merged earlier this week,
and when I looked at the mail thread about overlayfs, I concluded that
it wouldn't make it: the changes in the overlayfs tree in linux-next
are the version that got Nak'ed earlier, and the discussion about
trying to fix it ended without a positive conclusion.

This should be addressed as soon as Miklos rebases his changes on
top of 4.18-rc1 for the following merge window.

     Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux