On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:34:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/gfs2/bmap.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 628e366df11c ("gfs2: Iomap cleanups and improvements")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 7ee66c03e40a ("iomap: move IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY to gfs2")
>
> from the xfs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
We should have seen this before the gfs2 tree was merged into Linus'
tree. Does that mean the gfs2 tree is not being pulled into the
linux-next tree?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
