On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/dax/super.c
>
> between commits:
>
> ba23cba9b3bd ("fs: allow per-device dax status checking for filesystems")
> 80660f20252d ("dax: change bdev_dax_supported() to support boolean returns")
>
> from the xfs tree and commit:
>
> e76384884344 ("mm: introduce MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX and CONFIG_DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS")
>
> from the nvdimm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Resolution looks good to me Stephen. Thanks for fixing this up, I'll
let Linus know in the libnvdimm pull request.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
