Hi Jakub, On Mon, 14 May 2018 13:41:40 -0700 Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 14 May 2018 11:57:00 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > diff --cc tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > index 8da4eeb101a6,df54c4c9e48a..000000000000 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > @@@ -2163,9 -2193,12 +2193,12 @@@ int bpf_prog_load_xattr(const struct bp > > > > if (!attr) > > return -EINVAL; > > + if (!attr->file) > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > - obj = bpf_object__open(attr->file); > > + obj = __bpf_object__open(attr->file, NULL, 0, > > + bpf_prog_type__needs_kver(attr->prog_type)); > > - if (IS_ERR(obj)) > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj)) > > return -ENOENT; > > This is okay, thanks. The OR_NULL is unnecessary just using the > bpf-next code is a better merge IMO. Thanks, I have updated my merge resolution from today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpiYulRmmz94.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
