On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:51:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
The look entirely correct, but oddly enough my compiler did not bother
to warn.
Fix below:
--
>From 6610bd5bbbf05fa1d925b0601a09e84cada9e0a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:24:34 +0200
Subject: memstick: remove unused variables
Fixes: 7c2d748e8476 ("memstick: don't call blk_queue_bounce_limit")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c | 1 -
drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
index b2d025f42d14..a15181fa45f7 100644
--- a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
+++ b/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
@@ -2094,7 +2094,6 @@ static const struct block_device_operations msb_bdops = {
static int msb_init_disk(struct memstick_dev *card)
{
struct msb_data *msb = memstick_get_drvdata(card);
- struct memstick_host *host = card->host;
int rc;
unsigned long capacity;
diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
index a2fadc605750..5ee932631fae 100644
--- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
+++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
@@ -1170,7 +1170,6 @@ static int mspro_block_init_card(struct memstick_dev *card)
static int mspro_block_init_disk(struct memstick_dev *card)
{
struct mspro_block_data *msb = memstick_get_drvdata(card);
- struct memstick_host *host = card->host;
struct mspro_devinfo *dev_info = NULL;
struct mspro_sys_info *sys_info = NULL;
struct mspro_sys_attr *s_attr = NULL;
--
2.17.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
