Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
between commit:
e782bdcf58c5 ("bpf, x64: remove ld_abs/ld_ind")
from the bpf-next tree and commit:
5f26c50143f5 ("x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (the former commit removed some code modified by the latter,
so I just removed it) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now
fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts
should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is
submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with
the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpfr0mlSjH5t.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
