Hi Johan,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 08:38:03 +0300 Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 45a42bc9cc65 ("Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Remove DMI quirk for the MINIX Z83-4")
> > f9b95db0165a ("Bluetooth: btrsi: remove unused including <linux/version.h>")
> > 96e58d368fa6 ("Bluetooth: Set HCI_QUIRK_SIMULTANEOUS_DISCOVERY for BTUSB_QCA_ROME")
> > 9ea471320e13 ("Bluetooth: Mark expected switch fall-throughs")
> >
> > are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>
> I think this is because I fixed up a missing author name in "Bluetooth:
> hci_bcm: Remove DMI quirk for the MINIX Z83-4" and did a push --force,
> whereas these patches were originally committed by Marcel. Should I be
> adding my signed-off-by to all affected patches when doing such rebases?
Yep, Ideally we should have a Signed-off-by from everyone who involved
in getting the patches into the final tree. That definitely means that
the final committer needs to add one.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgplzqKzqvoWV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
