Em Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:42:44 -0800 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > And some maintainers end up using multiple repositories as branches > > (the old _original_ git model). Again, you can just use "git fetch + > > git reset", of course, but that's a bit unsafe. In contrast, doing > > "git pull --ff-only" is a safe convenient operation that does both the > > fetch and the update to whatever state. > > > > But you do need that "--ff-only" to avoid the merge. > > OK. I guess it is legit (and semi-sensible) for downstream > contributors to "git pull --ff-only $upstream $release_tag_X" to > bring their long-running topic currently based on release X-1 up to > date with respect to release X. It probably makes more sense than > rebasing on top of release X, even though it makes a lot less sense > than merging their topics into release X. > > As you said, pull of a tag that forbids fast-forward by default is > rather old development (I am kind of surprised that it was so old, > in v1.7.9), so it may be a bit difficult to transition. > > There is > > [pull] > ff = only > > but pull.ff is quite global, and not good for intermediate level > maintainers who pull to integrate work of their downstream (for > which they do want the current "do not ff, record the tag in a merge > commit" behaviour) and also pull to catch up from their upstream > (which they want "ff-when-able"). They need to control between > ff=only and ff=when-able, depending on whom they are pulling from. Yes, that's my pain. I don't want ff only when pulling from others, only when pulling from upstream tree. > > We may want per-remote equivalent for it, i.e. e.g. > > [pull] > ff=false ;# good default for collecting contributions > > [remote "torvalds"] > pullFF = only ;# good default for catching up > > or something like that, perhaps? Yeah, something like that works. Please notice, however, that what I usually do is: $ git remote update torvalds $ git merge <tag> (or git pull . <tag>) So, for the above to work, it should store somehow the remote from where a tag came from. The reason is that I keep locally a cache with several tree clones (in bare mode) s that I bother enough to cache (linus, -stable, -next), as pulling from BR is time consuming, and I want to do it only once and use the same "cache" for all my git clones. I have a few git workdirs for my upstream work, but, as a patch developer, I also have "independent"[1] git repositories. [1] Due to disk constraints, the clones actually use --shared. So, the common objects are actually stored inside a single tree. Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
