Hi Thomas, On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:23:17 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 17/01/2018 12:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > >> [This is the same conflict I reported the day before yesterday, but one > > >> of the commits has moved and another that contributed has been dropped.] > > >> diff --cc arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > > >> index aa09559b2c0b,19f35be95f16..000000000000 > > >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > > >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > > >> @@@ -211,7 -209,6 +211,8 @@@ > > >> #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4FMAPS ( 7*32+17) /* AVX-512 Multiply Accumulation Single precision */ > > >> > > >> #define X86_FEATURE_MBA ( 7*32+18) /* Memory Bandwidth Allocation */ > > >> +#define X86_FEATURE_RSB_CTXSW ( 7*32+19) /* Fill RSB on context switches */ > > >> ++#define X86_FEATURE_SEV ( 7*32+20) /* AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization */ > > > Groan..... > > > > > > > Brijesh, > > > > please send out again the (host-side) SEV series so that they are merged > > through the TIP tree instead of kvm.git. > > > > Even though Boris did review it, there's just too much stuff in there > > outside arch/x86/kvm. > > No. Keep it and lets next time coordinate the relevant bits and pieces > better. I reserve that bit 20 and let Linus sort out the trivial conflict > when merging the stuff. I just picked that bit 20 when resolving the conflict. The original patch used bit 11, so the resolution could use any other sensible bit. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
