On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:11:45PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:58:54 -0800
>
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:53:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >>
> >> kernel/bpf/verifier.o: In function `bpf_check':
> >> verifier.c:(.text+0xd86e): undefined reference to `bpf_patch_call_args'
> >>
> >> Caused by commit
> >>
> >> 1ea47e01ad6e ("bpf: add support for bpf_call to interpreter")
> >>
> >> interacting with commit
> >>
> >> 290af86629b2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config")
> >>
> >> from the bpf and net trees.
> >>
> >> I have just reverted commit 290af86629b2 for today. A better solution
> >> would be nice (lie fixing this in a merge between the net-next and net
> >> trees).
> >
> > that's due to 'endif' from 290af86629b2 needs to be moved above
> > bpf_patch_call_args() definition.
>
> That doesn't fix it, because then you'd need to expose
> interpreters_args as well and obviously that can't be right.
>
> Instead, we should never call bpf_patch_call_args() when JIT always on
> is enabled. So if we fail to JIT the subprogs we should fail
> immediately.
right, as I was trying to say one extra hunk would be needed for net-next.
I was reading this patch:
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a2b211262c25..ca80559c4ec3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5267,7 +5267,11 @@ static int fixup_call_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
depth = get_callee_stack_depth(env, insn, i);
if (depth < 0)
return depth;
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+#else
bpf_patch_call_args(insn, depth);
+#endif
}
return 0;
but below should be fine too.
Will test it asap.
> This is the net --> net-next merge resolution I am about to use to fix
> this:
>
> ...
> +static int fixup_call_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
> + struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
> - int i, depth;
> ++ int i, depth, err;
> +
> - if (env->prog->jit_requested)
> - if (jit_subprogs(env) == 0)
> ++ err = 0;
> ++ if (env->prog->jit_requested) {
> ++ err = jit_subprogs(env);
> ++ if (err == 0)
> + return 0;
> -
> ++ }
> ++#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
> + for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++, insn++) {
> + if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) ||
> + insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
> + continue;
> + depth = get_callee_stack_depth(env, insn, i);
> + if (depth < 0)
> + return depth;
> + bpf_patch_call_args(insn, depth);
> + }
> - return 0;
> ++ err = 0;
> ++#endif
> ++ return err;
> +}
> +
> /* fixup insn->imm field of bpf_call instructions
> * and inline eligible helpers as explicit sequence of BPF instructions
> *
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
