Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Commit
>> >
>> >   0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device")
>> >
>> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its .
>>                                       ^
>> committer
>
> It was me who originally committed and pushed this to the bluetooth-next
> tree, and the commit does have a signed-off-by from me. However, it
> looks like Marcel did some reshuffling/rebasing of the tree and now the
> commit shows him in the committer field.

In PDx86 subsystem we in the result of this check split our (Darren's
and mine) review queues to a separate *non-published* (OK, they are
visible, but not considered published) branches.
Rebase, as stated that time by Linus, as formally creating new commits.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux