On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 01:09:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c > > between commit: > > 8272d099d05f ("usbip: vhci: stop printing kernel pointer addresses in messages") > > from the usb.current tree and commit: > > 81d8a8eb0a97 ("USB: usbip: fix spelling mistake: "synchronuously" -> "synchronously"") > > from the usb tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c > index 112ebb90d8c9,a9813f1d507d..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c > @@@ -29,9 -30,9 +29,9 @@@ struct urb *pickup_urb_and_free_priv(st > case -ENOENT: > /* fall through */ > case -ECONNRESET: > - dev_info(&urb->dev->dev, > - "urb %p was unlinked %ssynchronously.\n", urb, > - status == -ENOENT ? "" : "a"); > + dev_dbg(&urb->dev->dev, > - "urb seq# %u was unlinked %ssynchronuously\n", > ++ "urb seq# %u was unlinked %ssynchronously\n", > + seqnum, status == -ENOENT ? "" : "a"); > break; > case -EINPROGRESS: > /* no info output */ Thanks for the fixup, I'll do it when these trees converge in a week or so. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html