Hi Dan,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 20:25:18 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ugh, yes. Looks correct. I might have confused my build success
> notifications from 0day. I'll spin out a new branch to make sure this
> is the last of it.
Thanks.
While I have your attention ... did you consider using the other
paradigm:
In arch include files:
#define pud_write pud_write
static inline int pud_write(pud_t pud)
.....
Then in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h:
#ifndef pud_write
tatic inline int pud_write(pud_t pud)
{
....
}
#endif
If you had, then the powerpc code would have worked ... ;-)
and many of the other interfaces in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h are
protected that way ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
