----- On Nov 15, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Thomas Gleixner tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >> ----- On Nov 15, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> >> ----- On Nov 15, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> > Can we please handle this as any other feature which is not ready before >> >> > the merge window and postpone the rseq stuff for 4.16? >> >> >> >> Linus showed interest in merging the rseq tree when we discussed at the >> >> Kernel Summit. The tree has not changed much since then. I only integrated >> >> membarrier patches that were implemented around the time of the 4.14 merge >> >> window, which I queued for the 4.15 (current) window. >> > >> > Linus showed interest for a lot of things in the past. That does not mean >> > it makes things magically complete and ready. >> > >> > As Michael pointed out there is no man page, not even a draft for it >> > available. See: Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst >> >> The rseq commit has a manpage associated for seq. The cpu_opv does not have it >> yet, nor the new membarrier commands. I plan to write those quickly after the >> tree reaches master. > > And that's a special rule for you, right? > > Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst is for everybody else who > implements a new syscall. I'll prepare the manpage before the PR. Thanks, Mathieu > > Thanks, > > tglx -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
