Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:47:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/Kconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   396a5d4a5c32 ("arm64: Unconditionally support {ARCH_}HAVE_NMI{_SAFE_CMPXCHG}")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   087133ac9076 ("locking/qrwlock, arm64: Move rwlock implementation over to qrwlocks")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 38f8d26208af,6205f521b648..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@@ -21,8 -21,25 +21,25 @@@ config ARM6
>   	select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>   	select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX
>   	select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
>  -	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG if ACPI_APEI_SEA
>  +	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_BH if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_IRQ if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_IRQSAVE if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_BH if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_IRQ if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_IRQSAVE if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_BH if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ if !PREEMPT
> + 	select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE if !PREEMPT
>   	select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
> + 	select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
>   	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
>   	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
>   	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING

Just a reminder that this conflict still exists (but is now between the
arm64 and Linus' trees - since part of the tip tree has been merged).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux