Hi all,
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 07:57:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 37f6b42e9c29 ("ACPI/IORT: Fix PCI ACS enablement")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 896dd2c32484 ("ACPI/IORT: Make platform devices initialization code SMMU agnostic")
>
> from the arm64 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index de56394dd161,7dc964f4d8f1..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@@ -1215,7 -1326,7 +1357,8 @@@ static void __init iort_init_platform_d
> struct acpi_table_iort *iort;
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> int i, ret;
> + bool acs_enabled = false;
> + const struct iort_dev_config *ops;
>
> /*
> * iort_table and iort both point to the start of IORT table, but
> @@@ -1235,12 -1346,8 +1378,11 @@@
> return;
> }
>
> + if (!acs_enabled)
> + acs_enabled = iort_enable_acs(iort_node);
> +
> - if ((iort_node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU) ||
> - (iort_node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3)) {
> -
> + ops = iort_get_dev_cfg(iort_node);
> + if (ops) {
> fwnode = acpi_alloc_fwnode_static();
> if (!fwnode)
> return;
Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
