Hi Michal, On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:59:31 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From 31d551dbcb1b7987a4cd07767c1e2805849b7a26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:41:39 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] > mm-hmm-struct-hmm-is-only-use-by-hmm-mirror-functionality-v2-fix > > Compiler is complaining for allnoconfig > > kernel/fork.c: In function 'mm_init': > kernel/fork.c:814:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'hmm_mm_init' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > hmm_mm_init(mm); > ^ > kernel/fork.c: In function '__mmdrop': > kernel/fork.c:893:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'hmm_mm_destroy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > hmm_mm_destroy(mm); > > Make sure that hmm_mm_init/hmm_mm_destroy empty stups are defined when > CONFIG_HMM is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/hmm.h | 7 +++---- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h > index 9583d9a15f9c..aeb94e682dda 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hmm.h > +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h > @@ -508,11 +508,10 @@ static inline void hmm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm) > { > mm->hmm = NULL; > } > -#else /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HMM_MIRROR) */ > +#endif > + > +#else /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HMM) */ > static inline void hmm_mm_destroy(struct mm_struct *mm) {} > static inline void hmm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm) {} > -#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HMM_MIRROR) */ > - > - > #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HMM) */ > #endif /* LINUX_HMM_H */ What happens when CONFIG_HMM is defined but CONFIG_HMM_MIRROR is not? Or is that not possible (in which case why would we have CONFIG_HMM_MIRROR)? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html