Hi David, Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs-kdave tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/inode.c between commit: 58efbc9f5463 ("Btrfs: fix blk_status_t/errno confusion") from Linus' tree and commit: e6961cac730f ("btrfs: Move skip checksum check from btrfs_submit_direct to __btrfs_submit_dio_bio") from the btrfs-kdave tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc fs/btrfs/inode.c index 24bcd5cd9cf2,d184a46e46c4..000000000000 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@@ -7991,10 -8080,9 +8081,10 @@@ static blk_status_t dio_read_error(stru struct extent_io_tree *failure_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_failure_tree; struct bio *bio; int isector; - int read_mode = 0; + unsigned int read_mode = 0; int segs; int ret; + blk_status_t status; BUG_ON(bio_op(failed_bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE); @@@ -8021,11 -8109,11 +8111,11 @@@ bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_READ, read_mode); btrfs_debug(BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info, - "Repair DIO Read Error: submitting new dio read[%#x] to this_mirror=%d, in_validation=%d\n", + "repair DIO read error: submitting new dio read[%#x] to this_mirror=%d, in_validation=%d", read_mode, failrec->this_mirror, failrec->in_validation); - ret = submit_dio_repair_bio(inode, bio, failrec->this_mirror); - if (ret) { + status = submit_dio_repair_bio(inode, bio, failrec->this_mirror); + if (status) { free_io_failure(failure_tree, io_tree, failrec); bio_put(bio); } @@@ -8426,9 -8513,8 +8516,9 @@@ static inline blk_status_t btrfs_lookup return 0; } -static inline int __btrfs_submit_dio_bio(struct bio *bio, struct inode *inode, - u64 file_offset, int async_submit) +static inline blk_status_t +__btrfs_submit_dio_bio(struct bio *bio, struct inode *inode, u64 file_offset, - int skip_sum, int async_submit) ++ int async_submit) { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb); struct btrfs_dio_private *dip = bio->bi_private; @@@ -8541,9 -8625,9 +8630,9 @@@ static int btrfs_submit_direct_hook(str */ atomic_inc(&dip->pending_bios); - status = __btrfs_submit_dio_bio(bio, inode, file_offset, skip_sum, - ret = __btrfs_submit_dio_bio(bio, inode, file_offset, - async_submit); - if (ret) { ++ status = __btrfs_submit_dio_bio(bio, inode, file_offset, + async_submit); + if (status) { bio_put(bio); atomic_dec(&dip->pending_bios); goto out_err; @@@ -8561,9 -8645,8 +8650,8 @@@ } while (submit_len > 0); submit: - status = __btrfs_submit_dio_bio(bio, inode, file_offset, skip_sum, - async_submit); - ret = __btrfs_submit_dio_bio(bio, inode, file_offset, async_submit); - if (!ret) ++ status = __btrfs_submit_dio_bio(bio, inode, file_offset, async_submit); + if (!status) return 0; bio_put(bio); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html