2017-08-11 08:29+0200, David Hildenbrand:
> On 11.08.2017 01:28, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Commit
> >
> > 53a70daf3cfd ("KVM: nVMX: get rid of nested_release_page*")
> >
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
> >
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo's signed-off is missing.
Yes, it is a result of our workflow and there are many more patches like
that. In this case, I originally committed the patch on 08-03 and Paolo
rebased the branch on 08-07.
We rebase when testing discovers bugs and for the first few release
candidates (when there are not enough changes to put into next).
Should all rebases be done with the --signoff option?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
