On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 08:03:49AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 07:55 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:50:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry Doug, but it is not expected at all for the code which will > > > > go to 4.14. > > > > > > > > Both patches in question were targeted for 4.13 and you was > > > > expected to > > > > see the merge conflicts during last month or so, prior to merge > > > > window of 4.13. > > > > > > > > In 4.14, you should base your tree on Linus's tree and don't have > > > > ANY > > > > conflicts in your subsystem, between ANY subsystems and > > > > especially > > > > Linus, so we will be able to develop and test. > > > > > > > > For me, this merge conflict puts a large sign, that your tree is > > > > not ready for 4.14. > > > > > > > > Please base your tree on Linus's tree. > > > > > > And if these commits are destined for v4.14, then they should not > > > have > > > been in linux-next yet. > > > > See, this announcement, > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=149980130008834&w=2 > > Yes, and the patch in question is one of the many that I pulled out as > fixes that I would end up submitting during the -rc cycle. Hence why I > put the for-next tag on it. OK, hope that the picture with your branches will be clear very soon. Till when we can't create shared code. Thanks > > -- > Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> > GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD > Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
