On 07/03/2017 03:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c between commit: 425e1ed73e65 ("arm64: fix endianness annotation for 'struct jit_ctx' and friends") from the arm64 tree and commit: f1c9eed7f437 ("bpf, arm64: take advantage of stack_depth tracking") from the net-next tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Looks good to me, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html