Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kselftest tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:31:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/common_tests
>   tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/run_numerictests
>   tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/run_stringtests
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   d644437a1dc6 ("tools/testing/selftests/sysctl: Add pre-check to the value of writes_strict")
> 
> from the kselftest tree and commit:
> 
>   fed7038685f3 ("test_sysctl: add generic script to expand on tests")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I removed the files and so, for now I have effectively
> dropped the kselftest tree patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

urgh.

I'll drop 

test_sysctl-add-dedicated-proc-sysctl-test-driver.patch
test_sysctl-add-generic-script-to-expand-on-tests.patch
test_sysctl-test-against-page_size-for-int.patch
test_sysctl-add-simple-proc_dointvec-case.patch
test_sysctl-add-simple-proc_douintvec-case.patch
test_sysctl-test-against-int-proc_dointvec-array-support.patch

Luis, could you please redo these against the changes in linux-next and
resend?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux