Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvms390 tree got a conflict in:
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
between commit:
a75259825401 ("s390: rename struct psw_bits members")
from the s390 tree and commit:
8993df124642 ("KVM: s390: implement instruction execution protection for emulated")
from the kvms390 tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index e0f7d5fc7efd,6fda095f1a99..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@@ -790,8 -808,8 +808,8 @@@ static int guest_page_range(struct kvm_
return trans_exc(vcpu, PGM_PROTECTION, ga, ar, mode,
PROT_TYPE_LA);
ga &= PAGE_MASK;
- if (psw_bits(*psw).t) {
+ if (psw_bits(*psw).dat) {
- rc = guest_translate(vcpu, ga, pages, asce, mode);
+ rc = guest_translate(vcpu, ga, pages, asce, mode, &prot);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
} else {
@@@ -899,10 -918,10 +918,10 @@@ int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_
mode, PROT_TYPE_LA);
}
- if (psw_bits(*psw).t && !asce.r) { /* Use DAT? */
+ if (psw_bits(*psw).dat && !asce.r) { /* Use DAT? */
- rc = guest_translate(vcpu, gva, gpa, asce, mode);
+ rc = guest_translate(vcpu, gva, gpa, asce, mode, &prot);
if (rc > 0)
- return trans_exc(vcpu, rc, gva, 0, mode, PROT_TYPE_DAT);
+ return trans_exc(vcpu, rc, gva, 0, mode, prot);
} else {
*gpa = kvm_s390_real_to_abs(vcpu, gva);
if (kvm_is_error_gpa(vcpu->kvm, *gpa))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
