On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 14:10 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the target-bva tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 4ff83daa0200 ("target: Re-add check to reject control WRITEs with overflow data")
>
> from the target-updates tree and commit:
>
> 2c66660df665 ("target: Fix overflow/underflow handling of commands with a Data-Out buffer")
>
> from the target-bva tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think (guidance appreciated), see below) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Hello Stephen,
Thanks for having fixed this up. I hadn't noticed that Nic had queued up patches
that conflict with my patches. I will rebase my tree.
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
