Hi Jaegeuk,
Today's linux-next merge of the f2fs tree got a conflict in:
fs/f2fs/inline.c
between commit:
5fc36386d220 ("f2fs: check entire encrypted bigname when finding a dentry")
from the fscrypt tree and commit:
64c24ecb3cff ("f2fs: split make_dentry_ptr() into block and inline versions")
from the f2fs tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/f2fs/inline.c
index fa729ff6b2f9,0ccdefe9fdba..000000000000
--- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
@@@ -533,8 -533,8 +533,8 @@@ int f2fs_add_inline_entry(struct inode
f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(ipage, NODE, true);
- name_hash = f2fs_dentry_hash(new_name);
+ name_hash = f2fs_dentry_hash(new_name, NULL);
- make_dentry_ptr(NULL, &d, (void *)dentry_blk, 2);
+ make_dentry_ptr_inline(NULL, &d, dentry_blk);
f2fs_update_dentry(ino, mode, &d, new_name, name_hash, bit_pos);
set_page_dirty(ipage);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
