Hi Al,
Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
arch/sparc/Kconfig
between commit:
395102db441a ("sparc64: Use LOCKDEP_SMALL, not PROVE_LOCKING_SMALL")
from the sparc tree and commit:
28fa21828dbd ("HAVE_ARCH_HARDENED_USERCOPY is unconditional now")
from the vfs tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/sparc/Kconfig
index a59deaef21e5,b577dbff5efb..000000000000
--- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
@@@ -42,8 -42,7 +42,7 @@@ config SPAR
select OLD_SIGSUSPEND
select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS
- select HAVE_ARCH_HARDENED_USERCOPY
- select PROVE_LOCKING_SMALL if PROVE_LOCKING
+ select LOCKDEP_SMALL if LOCKDEP
select ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER
config SPARC32
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
