On 04/12/2017 11:14 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> > > Many ARM64 server systems boot via EFI, so enable support for some EFI >>> > > options to allow applications to interact with EFI. >>> > > >>> > > CONFIG_EFI_VARS enables sysfs support for reading and writing variables >> > >> > Isn't efivarfs preferred for that these days, or have I imagined that? >> > >> > Robin. > Ard, Leif? So my research suggests that efivarfs is a replacement for CONFIG_EFI_VARS. We may still have some older programs that use the sysfs entries, but I'm not sure. Regardless, I will drop EFI_VARS from v2 of the patset, and just set EFI_CAPSULE_LOADER. -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
