Hi Olof and Arnd,
On mer., avril 12 2017, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the mvebu tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 3c9d36192802 ("arm64: set CONFIG_MMC_BCM2835=y in defconfig")
>
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>
> 6ff829553345 ("arm64: configs: enable SDHCI driver for Xenon")
>
> from the mvebu tree.
How do you want to proceed with this conflict?
Do you want that I merged arm-soc/next/arm64 in my mvebu/defconfig64
branch before applying my patch ?
Or do you prefer that I continue to base my branch on v4.11-rc1 and then
you will take care of the conflict when pulling the branch?
Thanks,
Gregory
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> BTW, that arm-soc commit has no Signed-off-by from its committer :-(
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index ab4461b6b226,93b0aab959c0..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@@ -402,7 -401,7 +402,8 @@@ CONFIG_MMC_DW_EXYNOS=
> CONFIG_MMC_DW_K3=y
> CONFIG_MMC_DW_ROCKCHIP=y
> CONFIG_MMC_SUNXI=y
> +CONFIG_MMC_BCM2835=y
> + CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_XENON=y
> CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y
> CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y
> CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO=y
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
