On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:02:50PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > So basically we need CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME to be 64 in the exported > header but 128 in the kernel header? In which case the kbuild patch > needs to be changed not removed. Or the merge resolution needs to be > cleverer. Actually the kbuild patch just needs to be reverted. We should not export CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME at all. Each user-space interface that uses it already has its own limit and should not refer to the in-kernel value. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
