Hi Dave,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
between commit:
dd68f2ba0720 ("drm/i915/execlists: Wrap tail pointer after reset tweaking")
from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:
944a36d472be ("drm/i915: Assert that the request->tail is always qword aligned")
from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 91555d4e9129,77168e673e0a..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@@ -1440,9 -1268,8 +1268,10 @@@ static void reset_common_ring(struct in
GEM_BUG_ON(request->ctx != port[0].request->ctx);
/* Reset WaIdleLiteRestore:bdw,skl as well */
- request->tail = request->wa_tail - WA_TAIL_DWORDS * sizeof(u32);
+ request->tail =
+ intel_ring_wrap(request->ring,
+ request->wa_tail - WA_TAIL_DWORDS*sizeof(u32));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(request->tail, 8));
}
static int intel_logical_ring_emit_pdps(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
