On 3/23/17 5:10 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:05:14 +1100Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: kernel/bpf/hashtab.c between commit: 8c290e60fa2a ("bpf: fix hashmap extra_elems logic") from Linus' tree and commit: bcc6b1b7ebf8 ("bpf: Add hash of maps support") from the net-next tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.I did the same resolution just an hour ago when merging net into net-next.
yes. that's correct merge conflict resolution. Just rebuilt and retested. All looks good. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
