Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/proc/base.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 68eb94f16227 ("proc: Better ownership of files for non-dumpable tasks in user namespaces")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> caffc373c573 ("statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available")
>
> from the vfs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc fs/proc/base.c
> index b8f06273353e,b5a5d3cab358..000000000000
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@@ -1724,11 -1711,13 +1724,12 @@@ out_unlock
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - int pid_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry, struct kstat *stat)
> + int pid_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
> + u32 request_mask, unsigned int query_flags)
> {
> - struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
> + struct inode *inode = d_inode(path->dentry);
> struct task_struct *task;
> - struct pid_namespace *pid = dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info;
> - const struct cred *cred;
> + struct pid_namespace *pid = path->dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info;
>
> generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
