Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
fs/block_dev.c
between commit:
b1d2dc5659b4 ("block: Make blk_get_backing_dev_info() safe without open bdev")
from the block tree and patch:
"fs: add i_blocksize()"
from the akpm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/block_dev.c
index 73031ec54a7b,921e868e84de..000000000000
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@@ -988,8 -971,7 +988,8 @@@ struct block_device *bdget(dev_t dev
bdev->bd_contains = NULL;
bdev->bd_super = NULL;
bdev->bd_inode = inode;
+ bdev->bd_bdi = &noop_backing_dev_info;
- bdev->bd_block_size = (1 << inode->i_blkbits);
+ bdev->bd_block_size = i_blocksize(inode);
bdev->bd_part_count = 0;
bdev->bd_invalidated = 0;
inode->i_mode = S_IFBLK;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
