On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote:
[...]
Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]?
Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and
defconfig.
If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up
a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test.
If there is something else that needs to be done let me know.
[0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
[1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/
If you could work with Tony (his email is at the bottom of the crosstool
front page in [1]) to get the or32 binutils updated, that would be
great. With all the arch currrently in linux, I pretty much have to
just use what is available from kernel.org as prebuilts.
Different problem, but from the 0day info I thought you might be interested
in the following breakage as well (seen in -next).
/opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_adedata':
/opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c:185:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables'
Reported on kerneltests.org.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
