On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: >> > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged through >> > vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's fix had conflict. Could you apply >> > below fix in your tree? I think in general for possible interface change in >> > future we still need a pull request for i915 to resolve dependence earlier. >> >> Hi Zhenyu, >> >> Hopefully this abstraction will help to isolate vendor drivers from >> mdev API changes in the future. I can certainly roll this patch into >> the original to maintain bisectability. I want to get these changes in >> for rc3, will a pull request for the i915 changes be sent this week? > > Send to Jani who is managing i915 fixes pull. Send what to me? I've pushed fixes to drm-intel-fixes today for testing, and expect to send a pull request to Dave early Thursday. If there's a conflict, it can usually be solved while merging, like Stephen has done. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
