Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/29/2016 01:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

   net/sched/cls_flower.c

between commit:

   d936377414fa ("net, sched: respect rcu grace period on cls destruction")

from the net tree and commit:

   13fa876ebd03 ("net/sched: cls_flower: merge filter delete/destroy common code")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Looks good to me, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux