Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:49:29PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> doesn't look correct, if bio_readpage_error() is called from the 
> ->bi_end_io() handler. bi_size is generally zeroed at that time.

At least some of these bios are magic btrfs-internal ones that never
reach the block layer.  But I don't think all are, and both the new
code and one of the old cases are broken.  David, can you drop
this one patch for now, and I'll restart the discussion on the
failfast behavior on the btrfs list?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux