On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> + /* Please keep the leaf sorted by cpuid_bit.level for faster search. */
> + static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
> + { X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF, CPUID_ECX, 0, 0x00000006, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_EPB, CPUID_ECX, 3, 0x00000006, 0 },
> ++ { X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3, CPUID_EBX, 1, 0x00000010, 0 },
> ++ { X86_FEATURE_CAT_L2, CPUID_EBX, 2, 0x00000010, 0 },
> ++ { X86_FEATURE_CDP_L3, CPUID_ECX, 2, 0x00000010, 1 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT, CPUID_EBX, 25, 0x00000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4VNNIW, CPUID_EDX, 2, 0x00000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4FMAPS, CPUID_EDX, 3, 0x00000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE, CPUID_EDX, 7, 0x80000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_CPB, CPUID_EDX, 9, 0x80000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK, CPUID_EDX, 11, 0x80000007, 0 },
> + { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
> };
This should be
> + static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
> + { X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF, CPUID_ECX, 0, 0x00000006, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_EPB, CPUID_ECX, 3, 0x00000006, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT, CPUID_EBX, 25, 0x00000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4VNNIW, CPUID_EDX, 2, 0x00000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4FMAPS, CPUID_EDX, 3, 0x00000007, 0 },
> ++ { X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3, CPUID_EBX, 1, 0x00000010, 0 },
> ++ { X86_FEATURE_CAT_L2, CPUID_EBX, 2, 0x00000010, 0 },
> ++ { X86_FEATURE_CDP_L3, CPUID_ECX, 2, 0x00000010, 1 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE, CPUID_EDX, 7, 0x80000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_CPB, CPUID_EDX, 9, 0x80000007, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK, CPUID_EDX, 11, 0x80000007, 0 },
> + { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
> };
tip will carry a proper resolution today.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
