Hi Rafael,
Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
between commits:
eef0b282bb58 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains")
f9d1f7a7ad91 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Fix the imx_gpc_genpd_init() error path")
from the imx-mxs tree and commit:
59d65b73a23c ("PM / Domains: Make genpd state allocation dynamic")
from the pm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
index b54db47f6f32,57a410bbb6a2..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
@@@ -430,18 -423,20 +423,28 @@@ static int imx_gpc_genpd_init(struct de
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS))
return 0;
+ imx6q_pu_domain.base.states = devm_kzalloc(dev,
+ sizeof(*imx6q_pu_domain.base.states),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!imx6q_pu_domain.base.states)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ imx6q_pu_domain.base.states[0].power_off_latency_ns = 25000;
+ imx6q_pu_domain.base.states[0].power_on_latency_ns = 2000000;
+ imx6q_pu_domain.base.state_count = 1;
+
- pm_genpd_init(&imx6q_pu_domain.base, NULL, false);
- return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node,
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(imx_gpc_domains); i++)
+ pm_genpd_init(imx_gpc_domains[i], NULL, false);
+
+ ret = of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node,
&imx_gpc_onecell_data);
+ if (ret)
+ goto power_off;
+
+ return 0;
+power_off:
+ imx6q_pm_pu_power_off(&imx6q_pu_domain.base);
clk_err:
while (i--)
clk_put(imx6q_pu_domain.clk[i]);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
