On 9/27/16 9:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:23:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function 'kiblnd_hdev_setup_mrs':
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c:2317:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'ib_get_dma_mr' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> mr = ib_get_dma_mr(hdev->ibh_pd, acflags);
>> ^
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c:2317:5: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>> mr = ib_get_dma_mr(hdev->ibh_pd, acflags);
>> ^
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>> 5ef990f06bd7 ("IB/core: remove ib_get_dma_mr")
>>
>> I have used the rdma tree from next-20160923 for today.
>
> As pointed out by Christoph, I should have just disabled the driver in
> staging, so today I just applied the patch below. Doug, that should
> probably be applied to the rdma tree so that you don't break Linus'
> tree when it gets merged.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:35:28 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] starging/lustre: disable LNET infiniband support
>
> Commit 5ef990f06bd7 ("IB/core: remove ib_get_dma_mr") broke the
> lustre LNET infiniband support. Since this is in drivers/staging,
> lets just disable it for now until ti can be fixed properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/Kconfig
> index 2b5930150cda..13b43278a38d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/Kconfig
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ config LNET_SELFTEST
> config LNET_XPRT_IB
> tristate "LNET infiniband support"
> depends on LNET && INFINIBAND && INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS
> + depends on BROKEN
> default LNET && INFINIBAND
> help
> This option allows the LNET users to use infiniband as an
>
That doesn't seem like a particularly good thing to put in. Wouldn't
you end up just reverting it later when they fix lustre? And are you
going to revert the revert when it breaks again and revert the revert of
the revert when it's fixed again? That just seems a lot of churn. I
thought it was generally accepted that things in staging might or might
not work and if they don't, we don't care? Am I wrong on that?
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD
Red Hat, Inc.
100 E. Davie St
Raleigh, NC 27601 USA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
