On Tuesday 27 September 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> diff --cc include/asm-generic/percpu.h
> index 70fefec69e61,40e887068da2..000000000000
> --- a/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
> @@@ -108,9 -118,9 +118,9 @@@ do {
> #define this_cpu_generic_read(pcp) \
> ({ \
> typeof(pcp) __ret; \
> - preempt_disable(); \
> + preempt_disable_notrace(); \
> - __ret = *this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)); \
> + __ret = raw_cpu_generic_read(pcp); \
> - preempt_enable(); \
> + preempt_enable_notrace(); \
> __ret; \
> })
>
The merge solution seems correct, but this is one of only two trivial
patches I have queued up for asm-generic this time, so I wonder if we could
put the _notrace patch into the percpu tree that already has the
raw_cpu_generic_read change to avoid the conflict.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
