On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:37:24AM +0000, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 02:27:47 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c: In function 'tegra_devfreq_target':
> > > drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c:500:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'clk_set_min_rate' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > clk_set_min_rate(tegra->emc_clock, rate);
> > > ^
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 797da5598f3a ("PM / devfreq: Add COMPILE_TEST for build coverage")
>
> @Rafael: Thank you!
>
>
> @Kozlowski:
>
> It looks like COMMON_CLK is required to be "selected" for TEGRA.
>
> Although COMMON_CLK is supposed to be widely used by most ARM platforms
> especially if "Multiple platfrom selection" for ARMv7 is used,
> COMPILE_TEST won't recognize it.
>
> Adding COMMON_CLK for TEGRA will solve this instance of issue; however,
> for COMPILE_TEST to be reasonably robust, each "COMPILE_TEST"ed item
> should "select" every required item. How do you want to proceed with
> COMPILE_TEST on SoC-specific device drivers?
I think drivers should depend on COMMON_CLK in such case. This tegra
driver probably does not require strict ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC dependency
because it does not use any SoC-specific data/functions etc. However it
uses common clock framework so explicit dependency looks proper to me.
In fact this is already seen in kernel like SND_SOC_TEGRA, SND_MXS_SOC,
PWM_IMG(with compile test), SND_SOC_RCAR (even without compile test).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
