On 2016-09-12 04:53, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Question, what is the best way to merge dependent patches? Considering > they will need a good amount of architecture testing, I think they will > have to go via arch trees. But it also does not make sense to merge these > kbuild changes upstream first, without having tested them. I think it makes sense to merge the kbuild changes via kbuild.git, even if they are unused and untested. Any follow-up fixes required to enable the first architecture can go through the respective architecture tree. Does that sound OK? Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
