On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:22:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi David, > > After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > fs/ntfs/attrib.c: In function 'ntfs_attr_set': > fs/ntfs/attrib.c:2549:35: error: implicit declaration of function 'inode_to_bdi' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(inode_to_bdi(inode), > ^ > fs/ntfs/attrib.c:2549:35: warning: passing argument 1 of 'balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] > In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:30:0, > from include/linux/swap.h:8, > from fs/ntfs/attrib.c:26: > include/linux/writeback.h:367:6: note: expected 'struct backing_dev_info *' but argument is of type 'int' > void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, > ^ > fs/ntfs/attrib.c:2591:35: warning: passing argument 1 of 'balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] > balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(inode_to_bdi(inode), > ^ > In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:30:0, > from include/linux/swap.h:8, > from fs/ntfs/attrib.c:26: > include/linux/writeback.h:367:6: note: expected 'struct backing_dev_info *' but argument is of type 'int' > void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, > ^ > fs/ntfs/attrib.c:2609:35: warning: passing argument 1 of 'balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] > balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(inode_to_bdi(inode), > ^ > In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:30:0, > from include/linux/swap.h:8, > from fs/ntfs/attrib.c:26: > include/linux/writeback.h:367:6: note: expected 'struct backing_dev_info *' but argument is of type 'int' > void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, > ^ > > Caused by commit > > a685fa61566d ("remove mapping from balance_dirty_pages*()") > > I assume some forgotten include(s). No, I picked a wrong version of the patchset. But the patchset should not have been in for-next as it's a change to writeback (a prerequisity for a btrfs patchset). Now removed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html